dsimcha:

> I decided to start a thread to help us make a rough plan for 
> Phobos's short-to-medium term development.

Not too much time ago there was a Phobos wish list thread. I suggest you to 
take a look at it (it contains my answer too, so I think there is no need to 
repeat it here).


> 2.  Come up with a wish list of high-priority modules that Phobos is 
> missing that would make D a substantially more attractive language than 
> it is now.

It's not just a matter of modules, but also of few functions to add to existing 
modules. I have some of those.
Another thing that will improve D attractiveness for people that try D for the 
fist time is to find ways to make more Phobos functions work with 
const/immutable input data (like string functions).

Bye,
bearophile

Reply via email to