2011/11/28 Timon Gehr <timon.g...@gmx.ch>: > On 11/28/2011 09:01 AM, so wrote: >> >> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 03:44:23 +0200, Walter Bright >> <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote: >> >>> On 11/27/2011 4:44 PM, Alexey Veselovsky wrote: >>>> >>>> "D has a true module system that supports separate compilation and >>>> generates and uses module summaries (highbrowspeak for "header files") >>>> automatically from source, so you don't need to worry about >>>> maintaining redundant files separately, unless you really wish to, in >>>> which case you can. Yep, that stops that nag right in mid-sentence." >>>> >>>> But it is not true... >>> >>> How is it not true? >> >> I don't know if .di generation from .d or .h is any good or bad, >> but the comparison of auto-generated .di files to hand crafted .h files >> doesn't make sense. > > Nobody stops you from hand crafting *.di files. >
And what sense is in hand crafting .di files? What would you do different? Remove method definitions/private members?
