Am 04.12.2011, 15:36 Uhr, schrieb Vladimir Panteleev
<vladi...@thecybershadow.net>:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:33:52 +0200, Marco Leise <marco.le...@gmx.de>
wrote:
Am 04.12.2011, 14:02 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com>:
On 2011-12-03 05:26, dsimcha wrote:
I volunteered ages ago to manage the review for the second round of
Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper. After the first round it was decided
that,
after a large number of minor issues were fixed, a second round would
be
necessary.
Significant open issues:
1. Should libcurl be bundled with DMD on Windows?
2. etc.curl, std.curl, or std.net.curl? (We had a vote a while back
but
it was buried deep in a thread and a lot of people may have missed it:
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=4ebd3219011eb0e4518d35ab )
I vote for std.net.curl.
Hey you std.net.curl people must be cheating. You were 50% of the
etc.curl people in the past, now you are at 90% of them. Or did some
change of mind happen in the community recently?
That's internet polls for you. I think we should keep voting as NG
replies, the same thing we do when voting on Phobos contributions.
Polling on the NG has two problems:
1. Polls generate a lot of noise here (single word posts).
2. Counting the results must be done manually.
Although voting is not anonymous, you can cheat here as well, by using two
names and email addresses. I'll have future polls allow only one vote per
IP address in any case.
