On 12 December 2011 05:58, Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:
> On 12/11/2011 10:34 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote: > >> In my experience programming embedded systems in highly constrained >> environments >> usually means assembly or at most a C compiler using lots >> of compiler specific extensions for the target environment. >> >> I fail to see how D without GC could be a better tool in such enviroments. >> > > For a system with a tiny amount of memory, D probably is the wrong tool. > My suggestion would be: > > 0..64K assembler > 64K..1M C > 1M+ D > > The larger your program is, the more D starts to pull ahead. > I'd like to hear your comment on my last big email in this thread.
