On 13.12.2011 02:39, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2011 02:28:29 torhu wrote:
It's actually not 'save' being a noun that's the problem. I just
thought of a counter-example:
--- struct Foo { // the data Bar data[];
// save data on shutdown? @property bool save() { return save_; }
@property bool save(bool shouldShave) { return save_ = shouldSave;
}
private: bool save_; } --- Not meant to be a realistic example, but
save is fine as a property here.
You can pretty much always come up with another function with a
completely different purpose wit the same name.
Personally, the _only_ issue that I have with save is the fact that
it's a property. The name save works well enough, and I can't think
of anything that's better.
Yes, that's my opinion too.
