On Saturday, 24 December 2011 at 23:12:27 UTC, bearophile wrote:
I was talking about the abundance of (({}){()}) and not about identifiers length.
It's the same fallacy. I can't read Carmack's mind, but I'm sure he's talking about shortening code the same way I would mean it if I said it - simpler concepts, fewer cases, less repetition. It's about how much you have to think about, now how much you have to read/write.
