> I want to warn against the paradoxical "I can't get creative use of feature X > working, therefore I'm going back to my old language where I can't even think > of X."
It may seem paradoxical at first, but isn't. That feature X, often together with Y and Z, could be one of the main reasons for choosing the language - so if that feature doesn't deliver, or isn't reliable enough, this is a valid reason to go back to a maybe less powerful, but at least reliable language. Not only because of the current failure, but also out of fear of what else may break. artur
