Jesse Phillips: > currently there is no way > to "hide" a non-static member function like you would do in C# > with 'new.' Is that intended once 'override' is required? and if > not why have 'new' usable for static methods?
As far as I know no other changes are planned linked to the introduction of compulsory 'override'. For the other questions probably Walter or Andrei are able to give you much better answer than me. Bye, bearophile
