On 8 January 2012 03:46, Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:
> It should also be possible to do the gc in another thread running at low > priority, if the only other running thread is doing the critical stuff and > is not the sole holder of references to any GC allocated memory it is using. > ... sound like unreliable restrictions. Now sure I follow exactly what you mean by 'only other running thread', and 'critical stuff'.
