On 1/19/12 5:57 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, January 19, 2012 17:41:44 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/12 4:43 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:06:00 -0500, torhu<no@spam.invalid> wrote:
If the type of byKeys is Range, I would expect to be able to treat it
like one. Not like one, then another, then another, then another... ad
infinitum.
I don't know what you mean. You can treat it like one.
-Steve
It's the rvalue aspect. byKey does not hold a range inside the hashtable
(as a member variable would do). Each use of byKey gives you a range
that you get to iterate from the beginning.
Well, that's part of the point of properties. They don't have to actually be
associated with any particular member variable. They just _act_ like the type
has that public member variable.
Yah, but .length acts to a better extent like an lvalue.
Andrei
