Re: Apparently unsigned types really are necessary

[bcs]

On 01/22/2012 01:42 AM, Mail Mantis wrote:

2012/1/22 Walter Bright<newshou...@digitalmars.com>:

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3495283

and getting rid of unsigned types is not the solution to signed/unsigned
issues.

Would it be sane to add integer overflow/carry runtime checks in
-debug builds? This could probably solve such issues, but we'd need
some means to avoid this checks when nesessary.

http://embed.cs.utah.edu/ioc/