On 20/01/12 01:25, Trass3r wrote:
Could we please have at least a warning if code isn't compatible with
64Bit?
It's really annoying to test out some code and having to fix a bunch of
stupid uint->size_t bugs just because the author is still on a 32 bit
machine.

Is that feasible?


IMHO the ideal solution would be:
- treat size_t as a magical type (not a simple alias).
- allow size_t -> uint if you are in a machine-specific version statement that implies 32 bits (eg, version(D_InlineAsm_X86), version(Win32), version(X86)). - allow size_t -> ulong if you are in a version statement that implies 64 bits.
- Otherwise, disallow implicit casts.

Incidentally this was a motivation for the 'one-definition rule' that I proposed for version statements: it means the compiler can easily identify which versions imply machine-specific.

Reply via email to