On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:27:24 +0400 Denis Shelomovskij <verylonglogin....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyway, looks like that isn't the problem I'm trying to solve. I > don't accenting on parsing C code (it's done in Function.__ctor and > is obvious). The problem is to generate fast wrapper when we already > know full function signature. OK. C2Hs wants to solve problem of writing bindings for C libraries by avoiding to learn some new IDL and provide all the tools in hosted langauge (Haskell) by offering some hooks to tailor higher-level API for bindings taking advantage of hosted language (e.g. GC instead of doing manual memory allocation). I also believe that just wrapping C library and using C API is not enough if we want to take advantage of e.g. SafeD's features. Sincerely, -- But those who, out of envy, disregard these teachings and do not follow them are to be considered bereft of all knowledge, befooled, and ruined in their endeavors for perfection. http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
