That's what I said in the original message. I proposed to do this only
if the unittest has a ddoc comment. :-)
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Don Clugston <d...@nospam.com> wrote:
> On 30/01/12 19:28, Marco Leise wrote:
>>
>> Am 30.01.2012, 18:55 Uhr, schrieb Don Clugston <d...@nospam.com>:
>>
>>> OR:
>>> /** optionally explain what this test is doing */
>>> unittest {.... }
>>
>>
>> Not bad. So a documented unittest would be turned into an example
>> section with "optinally explain what this test is doing" in DDoc?
>
>
> Yes.
> Has the advantage that it doesn't require any new syntax.
--
Bye,
Gor Gyolchanyan.
