Kapps wrote: > On 30/01/2012 12:34 PM, Don Clugston wrote: > >On 30/01/12 19:28, Marco Leise wrote: > >>Am 30.01.2012, 18:55 Uhr, schrieb Don Clugston <d...@nospam.com>: > >> > >>>OR: > >>>/** optionally explain what this test is doing */ > >>>unittest {.... } > >> > >>Not bad. So a documented unittest would be turned into an example > >>section with "optinally explain what this test is doing" in DDoc? > > > >Yes. > >Has the advantage that it doesn't require any new syntax. > > I really like this suggestion. Encourages unit tests AND encourages > examples while providing a nice way to do both, removing a bunch of > boilerplate code, and not breaking any existing code.
You can vote for it to hopefully raise some attention. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2630 Jens