On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 08:00:36PM +0100, Marco Leise wrote: [...] > I am fairly impressed by the results for 'D'. It's just right to ask > the user what he/she meant exactly and not print a list of 10000000 > results for everything with D in the text. In that sense it is much > like the disambiguation on Wikipedia (probably inspired by that?). > > What puzzles me is how they generate the one line description. It's > not a copy from Wikipedia as far as I can tell. Do they have little > monkeys that write descriptions for everything on the planet?
It's probably a copy from an older version of the Wikipedia article. T -- ASCII stupid question, getty stupid ANSI.