On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:19:11AM -0800, Walter Bright wrote: > On 2/10/2012 3:10 AM, deadalnix wrote: > >Typeless is great when sketching some piece of code, but you'll way more > >problem > >at the end. > > I've heard people say that typeless is just as good, because you > load them up with unit tests that verify the types. To me, this > doesn't seem like any advantage. I'd rather have the language > automatically check things for me, rather than worrying about having > complete unit test coverage, let alone the bother of writing them.
Though if it were D, it'd be so easy to write unittests that this wouldn't be a problem. But then D is strongly-typed anyway. :) T -- Some days you win; most days you lose.