"Daniel Murphy" <yebbl...@nospamgmail.com> wrote in message news:jh85rp$2rs4$1...@digitalmars.com... > "Paulo Pinto" <pj...@progtools.org> wrote in message > news:jh7v08$2chs$1...@digitalmars.com... >> If you remove all of that then how good would D- be in regard with >> existing languages being used for the same tasks? > > You still have all of D's compile-time magic, which I miss every time I > need to do embedded programming. You still have the simple syntax > improvement. I would love to be able to do away with the preprocessor and > stupidly_long_method_names_because_of_no_overloading_or_method_syntax. >
Plus a module system that's actually sane.
