On 13 February 2012 17:01, Zach the Mystic <reachzachatgooglesmailserv...@dot.com> wrote: > On 2/13/12 11:21 AM, bearophile wrote: >> >> Zach the Mystic: >> >> Regarding pure random generators, I have asked it too: >> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5249 > > > Aren't "pure" and "random" diametrically opposed in a fundamental way?
I'd say it was an oxymoron. -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';