On 02/16/2012 09:14 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:00:39PM -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/16/2012 8:47 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Well, in that case, we should replace 'in' with '∈'.
I would, but that doesn't work because of keyboarding issues.
I wasn't being serious. I was going to suggest to those who complain
about&& being too similar to&, that we should adopt ∧ and ∨ instead.
Nice and readable, and unambiguous. And we could use ∀ instead of
'foreach'; that would save so much typing!
∀ is "for all" so it couldn't be used. The code might hit a break.
I mean, D is already
standardized on Unicode, why not take advantage of all those nice
symbols that Unicode provides? ;-) (As long as you don't mention APL,
everybody will be just fine.)
T
