Re: package and virtual

[H. S. Teoh]

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 07:53:54PM -0500, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> package functions are currenly non-virtual.
> 
> The spec claims that "all non-sta­tic non-pri­vate non-tem­plate mem­ber func­
> tions are vir­tual," which would mean that package is supposed to be virtual. 
> But from what I recall, the plan is to leave package as non-virtual. So, is 
> that indeed the case and the spec needs to be fixed, or is package going to 
> be 
> made virtual at some point?
[...]

Virtual package functions would be interesting in theory... but I doubt
there's much practical use for such things. Will packages have an
inheritance hierarchy now?


T

-- 
Любишь кататься - люби и саночки возить.