Re: package and virtual

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-03-01 01:53, Jonathan M Davis wrote:

package functions are currenly non-virtual.

The spec claims that "all non-sta­tic non-pri­vate non-tem­plate mem­ber func­
tions are vir­tual," which would mean that package is supposed to be virtual.
But from what I recall, the plan is to leave package as non-virtual. So, is
that indeed the case and the spec needs to be fixed, or is package going to be
made virtual at some point?

- Jonathan M Davis

Is anyone even using "package"? I've basically never used it.

--
/Jacob Carlborg