> > But how to associate actions with a rule, in that case? I mean, some > > rules will have actions, some not. > > You could maybe just put D code in the grammar string, which gets > compiled as a string mixin by CTFE?
I could, but one of my driving goals while beginning this project a month ao was to use the shiny new lambda syntax directly :) "rule1", o => o "rule2", o => o etc.
