On Wednesday, 7 March 2012 at 03:24:23 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, March 07, 2012 03:49:46 Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Though, I still say the underlying silliness remains
ridiculous. currentTime >> currTime.
I don't understand this complaint at all. curr is an incredibly
common
abbreviation for current.
- Jonathan M Davis
I agree. curr isn't exactly uncommon. I'd personally probably
go with currentTime but it's perfectly readable as currTime.
Since it's already in Clock I'd even consider just using 'time'
or 'now' but I don't feel strongly about it.
Regards,
Brad Anderson
