On Thursday, March 08, 2012 04:26:11 Nick Sabalausky wrote: > Aside from the problems of excess paren nesting, I tend to think this is > backwards: > > foo(bar(baz(x+2)))
Yes, but that's how functions normally work, so flipping it around _is_ backwards from the normal, even if some people find it easier to understand. And I've written enough in functional languages that flipping it around just seems _really_ backwards to me. At this point, I always have a harder time reading code when someone insists on chaining UFCS calls rather than using normal function calls. But obviously YMMV. - Jonathan M Davis
