On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:43:34 -0500, Stewart Gordon <smjg_1...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On 08/03/2012 19:38, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
<snip>
Yes, I couldn't really find that. It does specifically say casting away
const and then
modifying is invalid, but it does not say anything about "if you know
the underlying data
is mutable". But again, this is the point I was trying to make, we are
casting away a
const-like attribute and modifying the data.
<snip>
No more than we are already doing with the inout return.
Except that technique has been approved by Walter and included in the
language.
-Steve
