On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 02:27:20PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > "Adam D. Ruppe" <destructiona...@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:tfdzpwcijnavdalmn...@forum.dlang.org... > > On Saturday, 10 March 2012 at 18:57:10 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote: > >> It can hardly be called a success technology-wise. > > > > It is significantly ahead of its competition at the time. > > And it was a big advancement over 3.1. Pre-emptive multitasking > anyone? [...]
I thought the Unix world has had that years before Windows. But not in the consumer PC market, I suppose. But 3.1 was such a sad mess that just about *anything* would be an improvement on it. T -- ASCII stupid question, getty stupid ANSI.
