On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 02:31:53PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote: [...] > writefln is still there with the same old functionality (which is > good, it *is* a good function). It's just that writeln has been added > and just happens to be better in every way for the majority of > use-cases. [...]
Strange, I still find myself using writef/writefln very frequently. When you want formatting in your output, printf specs are just sooo convenient. But perhaps it's just a symptom of my having just emerged from the C/C++ world. :-) T -- First Rule of History: History doesn't repeat itself -- historians merely repeat each other.