On Sunday, 11 March 2012 at 23:55:34 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
It may be a hack, but you know, those have special
semantics/meanings in the first place, so is it really that
bad? Consider also that contract blocks are now implicitly
const, etc.
Agreed. Those are already special, so I don't think it hurts to
make this change. But I may be missing some implications.
- toHash => pure, nothrow, const, @safe Walter Bright
- Re: toHash => pure, nothrow, const, @safe Alex Rønne Petersen
- Re: toHash => pure, nothrow, const, @safe bearophile
- Re: toHash => pure, nothrow, const, @safe H. S. Teoh
- Re: toHash => pure, nothrow, const, @safe Alex Rønne Petersen
-