"Ary Manzana" <a...@esperanto.org.ar> wrote in message news:jjne58$1ouf$1...@digitalmars.com... > > But if people didn't have an option to disable JS, we wouldn't have this > discussion. I think it as having an option to disable CSS. >
That's not even an accurate comparison anyway. Disabling CSS never does much to improve things, and usually it'll just make things *far* worse. People don't fuck up CSS nearly to the extent that they fuck up JS. Hell, CSS *can't* be fucked up as badly as JS can be. The "no JS == no CSS" comparison is like saying "Disabling JS is like disabling vowels". No, no it isn't like that. Not remotely.