Am 19.03.2012 10:03, schrieb F i L:
dennis luehring wrote:
i don't get the GC relation here?
all attribute values are static const - because they are
type-related (static) and read-only, attributes are type
orientated not instance orientated
C# doesn't support free-types (everything's wrapped up in
classes) so the technique isn't going to be identical. In D,
you'd need to be able to declare an attribute on virtually any
entity declaration and have the compiler dish out the appropriate
code.
Trove's suggesting that the compiler simply looks up user-defined
functions associated with<AttributeX> and inject the code into
the appropriate place, which I think is a good idea. The problem
I see is how to do more advanced structural changes like C# does
with [FieldOffset(0)]. Things like:
@Int.Fast int index;
assert(index.sizeof == int.sizeof) // always?
which might break the type system, so I'm not sure it's even
possible. The compiler might have passed the point of no-return
with such attributes.
Regardless, I think was Trove's suggesting would work well.
sound to simple to fit in non trival cases
