"Adam D. Ruppe" <destructiona...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:utkgtgcgguydxrabk...@forum.dlang.org... > > But, eh, D pwns C++ in so many ways that while I still > like C++, I'm no longer in the camp of "c++ is obviously > great and totally sufficient and if you don't see it, > you must be some kind of idiot" like I was for a while.
Heh, yea. I think in a way that's kind of the problem with C++: It can be technically considered "sufficient"...but that's it - it's *merely* sufficient. "Why have a Pop-Tart(tm) when you can have a warm delicious Pillsbury(tm) Toaster Strudel(tm)?" ;)
