On 3/21/12, H. S. Teoh <hst...@quickfur.ath.cx> wrote: > Sorry, I was thinking in terms of my AA implementation which is done > using a struct with operator overloading. I should've checked what the > behaviour of the current built-in AAs are before posting. :-P
Well in that case isn't it a necessity to keep compatibility with the old implementation? Do we really have to break user-code again?
