On 03/26/2012 02:41 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: > On 27.03.2012 0:27, James Blewitt wrote: >> Hello everybody, >> >> Thanks once again for the interest in my problem. I have posted the >> details and source code that recreates (at least for me) the poor >> performance. >> I didn't know how to post the code to the forum, so I posted it to my >> blog instead (see post update): >> >> http://jblewitt.com/blog/?p=462 >> >> Again, if I'm doing something stupid in my code (which is possible) then >> I apologise in advance. > > No need to apologize, but you are using 2.054, which is unfashionable :) > More importantly 2.054 contains old and rusty version of std.regex, the > new version was included in 2.057+. > BTW The current release is 2.058. > >> >> I'll take a look at the ctRegex as soon as I can. >> > > Yup, just update compiler+phobos. > >> Regards, >> James > >
My unofficial results comparing 2.056 to 2.058 on 64 bits: shakespeare.txt, 2.056 -> 1868 msecs shakespeare.txt, 2.058 -> 632 msecs data.csv, 2.056 -> 51953 msecs data.csv, 2.058 -> 1329 msecs That last line is pretty impressive. :) Ali
