Re: Nested functions should be exempt from sequential visibility rules

[Martin Nowak]

void foo(){
     void a()(){ ... }
     void b()  { ... }
}

That's a very simple workaround (albiet unintuitive - unless I'm just too

tired right now). It leads me to two questions:

1. How the heck does that work?

Symbol lookup is done upon the first instantiation of the local template.

I'd argue it shouldn't work, but it'd require copying the scope.
instantiation scope -> declaration scope -> sequence snapshot
So again b shouldn't be is a's scope.