On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:59:31 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
<schvei...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:53:34 -0400, deadalnix <deadal...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Plus, the package accessibility modifier would be broken with such a
pattern.
The all.d, package.d, _.d, or, as I propose foldername.d (and
submodules into foldername) do not break package accessibility
modifier, which is better.
I don't really know what you mean, I didn't read that post. Would you
mind posting a link or repeating that argument?
Also, nevermind :) I realize what you are talking about now.
This is a good point. Of course, there are other mechanisms to do this,
and DIP15 already proposes an improvement for this.
However, at least in the case of phobos, I don't think there's a lot of
instances of package accessibility modifier.
-Steve
