On 6 April 2012 18:17, Adam D. Ruppe <destructiona...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, 6 April 2012 at 15:07:04 UTC, Manu wrote:
>
>> But maybe the function approach has an
>> effect on the simplicity of the expression for a simple attribute, like a
>> single bool?
>>
>
> Meh, it is pretty similar:
>
> struct Serializable { bool yes; }
> bool Serializable(bool yes) { return yes; }
>
Indeed. And with that in mind...
On 6 April 2012 17:56, Piotr Szturmaj <bncr...@jadamspam.pl> wrote:
> @Uuid("...")
> interface MyIntf { }
>
> without explicitly declaring Uuid as attribute. However, I don't see any
> usage for primitive types:
>
> @5
> @"s"
> @false
>
> I think that allowing values of structs, classes and _eventually_ enums
> should be enough.
>
I totally agree, although I don't know what enum's offer that can't be
equally wrapped in a struct/class? They can probably be skipped as well.
