On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:13:45 +0100 Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote:
> The biggest problems with monads are that most imperative programmers > think they are some massive high magic that is incomprehensible to > mere mortals, and most functional programmers think they are simple > and that they understand them. Indeed. > If you get higher order functions, currying and partial evaluation, > then monads come naturally (*). I believe I got HoFs, currying & partial evolution, but maybe I was missing (*) In any case, as it is often said, I got a feeling that despite its potential cleanliness, the real-world Haskell code was not so readable. By deploying some coding discipline, we tend to believe that D can serve well as FP-language for the masses. :-) Sincerely, Gour -- When your intelligence has passed out of the dense forest of delusion, you shall become indifferent to all that has been heard and all that is to be heard. http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
