On Sunday, April 15, 2012 13:41:28 Jacob Carlborg wrote: > On 2012-04-15 04:58, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > > There have been quite a few good comments, but no review manager offer. > > Could someone please take this role? > > > > Again, it would be great to get std.benchmark in sooner rather than > > later because it can be used by subsequent submissions (many of which > > allege efficiency as a major advantage) to show they improve over the > > state of the art. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Andrei > > As far as I know, there are already several other projects/modules in > the pipeline before std.benchmark. If we are to review them in the order > they are submitted.
There are, but none of them are being reviewed at the moment or being pushed for a review. And there _is_ an argument for std.benchmark being high priority based on how it could affect future reviews. We should probably start reviewing _something_ soon though. We haven't had very good momentum on that of late. - Jonathan M Davis