On Thursday, 19 April 2012 at 10:28:08 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
On Thursday, 19 April 2012 at 09:24:23 UTC, Roman D. Boiko
wrote:
On Friday, 13 April 2012 at 09:57:49 UTC, Ary Manzana wrote:
Having a D compiler available as a library will (at least)
give these benefits:
What about joining forces with sdc then?
I think I will use some code from SDC and contibute back to it
now that it is liberally licensed. It wasn't an option when it
was under GNU, because I generally prefer possibility for
commercial usage.
However, I believe that the project I'm working on (DCT) has a
good potential and the D community will better benefit from two
alternatives. There are several design differences, and will be
more. This also gives me additional flexibility and more learning
opportunities.
I will dual-license (Boost+MIT) any part of my code if somebody
would like to incorporate such part in SDC. My question about
motivation for MIT licence was caused in particular by desire to
minimize possible overhead of dealing with two licenses for me.
