Nick Sabalausky:
Since implicit fallthrough is going away, that's more a problem with a *missing* warning (in the second example) rather than an erroneous warning.
Implicit fallthrough is going away, but Walter has decided to add it a special case, when the case is totally empty it's allowed. So both programs are correct (I don't love special cases, but here I think Walter doesn't want to cause too much D code disruption).
Bye, bearophile
