On Sunday, April 29, 2012 00:39:03 Timon Gehr wrote: > Oh, completely forgot about that one: > > - 'in' operator returning a pointer to the element.
Really? I use that all the time with AAs. Without that, you would have to do two lookups to get an object which might not be in the container, so it would be less efficient. I'd hate it if in stopped returning a pointer. We'd just have to add some other function which does the exact same thing as in now, and then I'd use in a _lot_ less. - Jonathan M Davis
