On 29-04-2012 03:20, ponce wrote:
Le 28/04/2012 20:47, Walter Bright a écrit :
What's your list?
- builtin complex types (I don't _need_ be able to write "4 + 5i")
+1.
- builtin associative arrays
- some builtin properties like arr.sort
+1, and .reverse. I'm also against .dup and .idup being properties, but
these don't modify the array in place, so I take less issue with them.
- lazy, I use it only for logging
lazy is horribly broken in many ways. Try to make a lazy value where the
producing delegate is pure.
(Hint: You can't.)
- foreach_reverse, never used it
- comma operator: when do you ever need it?
I've never used it intentionally, ever, but have been bitten in the ass
countless times because of it.
- in operator
Disagree. However, I do think it needs to made more useful (for
instance, I simply don't understand why I can't use in to test for
existence in an array).
Other than that, as a user I can't say having a lot of features is a big
problem, it's a major selling point.
--
- Alex
