Le 30/04/2012 18:13, Peter Alexander a écrit :
On Monday, 30 April 2012 at 15:35:19 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
So far, I've not seen a single response in favor of keeping the comma
operator.
Very few want it, but as a practicality, it would be unwise to remove it
(would break an awful lot of code).
Some have proposed that comma operator could create tuples. If void
members in tuples are automagically skipped, this won't break that many
code.
A first step in that direction would be to deprecate comma expression
where expressions before the last one have not type void.
