The effect is the same. You have a new type with a new init, that behaves the same way.
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Mehrdad <wfunct...@hotmail.com> wrote: > The one with TypeDef? > > That's not how it's defined though. > > On Saturday, 5 May 2012 at 18:31:44 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote: >> >> See my version. -- Bye, Gor Gyolchanyan.
