Walter Bright wrote: > never encountered a problem with it
Please recall the famous `fori=' vs. `for i=' mistake: one unintentional changed or added character might change the meening of the code but compile undetected: | auto x = +1L; | auto y = -1L; | auto z = .1L; Whereas | auto z = .1R; would need two changes to the intention. Because of `auto' and `real', which both still aren't in C, D might need to be more picky. -manfred
