Re: Defining a custom *constructor* (not initializer!)

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-05-07 18:01, Mehrdad wrote:
On Monday, 7 May 2012 at 09:18:11 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:

Doing it without a separate factory function (and maybe disabling new
along with it by protecting the constructor) is not possible in D.

Okay that answers my question then.

No, have a look at this example:

http://pastebin.com/UV5R82dg

A bit of a hack. An other option would to use a separate public method 
that acts as a constructor.

--
/Jacob Carlborg