Because the opBinary is a perfectly valid method. The inability to overload "is" only affects the rewrite of "A is B" to "A.opBinart!`is`(B)".
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:46 PM, bearophile <bearophileh...@lycos.com> wrote: > Gor Gyolchanyan: > > >> My question is, why not allow is operator to be overloadable for >> structures? > > > Or why the bad D compiler doesn't statically refuse the code like: > > >> bool opBinary(string op : "is")(typeof(null)) > > > Bye, > bearophile > -- Bye, Gor Gyolchanyan.
