Yeah, that's what I did. I replaced it with opEquals(typeof(null)). On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Steven Schveighoffer <schvei...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Wed, 09 May 2012 12:17:30 -0400, Gor Gyolchanyan > <gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I didn't know structs actually have an "is" operator. Good to know, >> there's a way to memcmp them this way. >> But being able to overload it wouldn't do any damage. The overloader >> of "is" should clearly know, that "is" is an identity check and not an >> arbitrary domain-specific equality check. >> Overloading "is" gives a syntax sugar for nullable structures and an >> optimization opportunity for large ones (for example a CRC checksum >> comparison). > > > The fact that it's not overloadable is useful in many situations. There are > certain cases you are truly looking for physical equality, and not logical > equality. > > Generally, if you want logical equality, use opEquals. > > -Steve
-- Bye, Gor Gyolchanyan.