On 5/11/12, Steven Schveighoffer <schvei...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Since null is its own type now..
What were the use-cases for making it a type? Seems odd to declare it: typeof(null) x; I mean what could you do with such a type?
On 5/11/12, Steven Schveighoffer <schvei...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Since null is its own type now..
What were the use-cases for making it a type? Seems odd to declare it: typeof(null) x; I mean what could you do with such a type?